Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36231511

RESUMO

The most commonly used technique for covering gingival recessions is the coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique due to its high success rate. In clinical situations where there is less keratinized tissue apical to the defect due to unfavorable anatomical conditions, a more advantageous technique for this situation should be considered, specifically the laterally positioned flap (LPF). The aim of this study was to compare the gingival thickness after gingival recession coverage using the laterally positioned flap supported by an augmented and non-augmented connective tissue graft (CTG). Thirty-four patients with 105 gingival recessions of Miller's class I and/or II were enrolled in this study. The method of choice was the laterally positioned flap. The test group was treated with previously augmented CTG harvested from the palatal mucosa while the control group was treated with a non-augmented CTG. Clinical measurements were recorded at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention. Clinical results showed a statistically more significant percentage of average and complete gingival recession coverage in the test group. The LPF in combination with an augmented CTG proves to be an effective alternative to the CAF. Greater improvement in gingival thickness was observed in the LPF with augmented CTG than in non-augmented CTG.


Assuntos
Retração Gengival , Tecido Conjuntivo/transplante , Seguimentos , Gengiva/transplante , Retração Gengival/cirurgia , Humanos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Confl Health ; 16(1): 48, 2022 Sep 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36085165

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Gaza Strip, like other settings of complex humanitarian emergencies, faces immense challenges in vaccinating its population against COVID-19. This study was conducted in October 2021 among Gaza's adult population and healthcare workers (HCWs). The primary aim was to estimate two indicators, coverage of COVID-19 vaccination and the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy. The secondary aim was to evaluate the two indicators' associations with globally identified risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a population-based survey of adults and a purposive survey of HCWs in Gaza. A multi-stage sampling design was used for the population survey component. For the HCW component, five health facilities were purposively selected as entry points; HCWs in the facilities holding clinical or other specialized positions were approached to participate in the survey. Data were summarized as univariable descriptive statistics with unweighted and weighted point estimates. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of risk factors with vaccination status and vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: A total of 1075 individuals were surveyed, of whom 906 were community members and 169 were HCWs. Population-weighted vaccine coverage was estimated to be 49.08% (95% CI 43.10-55.08). 89.35% of HCWs were vaccinated. Population-weighted vaccine hesitancy was estimated to be 34.08% (95% CI 28.14-40.56) in the overall population and 67.24% (95% CI 49.04-81.41) among the unvaccinated sub-group. In logistic regression vaccination was independently associated with male sex (aOR 1.88, p = 0.006, 95% CI 1.20-2.95), older age (40+ vs. 18-39 age group) (aOR 1.92, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.73-2.13), higher education (aOR 2.19, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.51-3.17), and confidence in the safety of the vaccine (aOR 13.8, p < 0.001, 95% CI 10.1-18.8). Risk factors for hesitancy were similar to those identified for vaccination status, however hesitant individuals were somewhat more likely to obtain vaccine information from family members (aOR 1.29, p = 0.051, 95% CI 1.00-1.67) and less likely to trust healthcare providers (aOR 0.58, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.49-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: The continued emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants reinforces the importance of achieving high levels of vaccination coverage globally-a difficult undertaking in Gaza. This study estimated half of Gaza's adult population received at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine by October 2021, and the majority of unvaccinated individuals were hesitant. Disparities in vaccination across the territory's demographic groups underscore the need for targeted outreach to these populations and messaging through community-based channels to permeate social networks of the unvaccinated.

3.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0267822, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35771799

RESUMO

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, much research has been conducted globally, but relatively few studies have been carried out in complex emergency settings that pose numerous operational challenges. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the barriers and enablers of a COVID-19 cohort study conducted in South Sudan and Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, to inform future research on COVID-19 and infectious diseases in humanitarian settings. We used a case study design embedded within the original prospective cohort study. Qualitative data was collected through four health facility assessments, 28 key informant interviews, and a focus group discussion. Data were analyzed using a manual thematic analysis approach and summarized against four primary themes: testing challenges and enablers, perceptions and attitudes towards COVID-19, national health system considerations, and study management considerations. Findings suggest most of the challenges affecting the cohort study were not specific to COVID-19 research but have been a feature of previous infectious disease research carried out in complex emergencies. However, the pandemic has exacerbated certain problems. The high proportion of travellers enrolled due to testing mandates, stigmatization of infected individuals linked to the heavy global focus on COVID-19, strained resources during waves of increasing infections, and remote management requirements all negatively impacted the cohort study. Factors that facilitated the research included proactive management, data quality oversight procedures, and strong collaboration with national health stakeholders. The global impact of COVID-19, its high public profile, and specific pandemic policies pose further operational challenges for research in already complex humanitarian settings. Future studies could plan mitigation measures that include flexibility in staffing and budgets, strategies to expand testing, and early partnerships with local organizations and health authorities.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Sudão do Sul/epidemiologia
4.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e060639, 2022 05 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584876

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Our study described demographic characteristics, exposures and symptoms, and comorbidities to evaluate risk factors of hospitalisation and mortality among cases in Juba, South Sudan (SSD) and North and South Kivu in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort of COVID-19 cases. METHODS: Individuals presenting for care at one of five study facilities in SSD (n=1) or DRC (n=4) or referred from home-based care by mobile medical teams between December 2020 and June 2021 were eligible for enrolment. Demographic characteristics, COVID-19 exposures, symptoms at presentation, as well as acute and chronic comorbidities, were evaluated using a standard questionnaire at enrolment. Disease progression was characterised by location of care using mixed-effects regression models. RESULTS: 751 individuals were eligible for enrolment. Among cases followed to discharge or death (n=519), 375 were enrolled outpatients (75.7%). A similar number of cases were enrolled in DRC (n=262) and SSD (n=257). Overall mortality was 4.8% (95% CI: 3.2% to 6.9%); there were no outpatient deaths. Patients presenting with any symptoms had higher odds of hospitalisation (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.78, 95% CI 1.47 to 5.27) and all deaths occurred among symptomatic individuals. Odds of both hospitalisation and mortality were greatest among cases with respiratory symptoms; presence of low oxygen levels on enrolment was strongly associated with both hospitalisation (AOR 7.77, 95% CI 4.22 to 14.29) and mortality (AOR 25.29, 95% CI 6.42 to 99.54). Presence of more than one chronic comorbidity was associated with 4.96 (95% CI 1.51 to 16.31) times greater odds of death; neither infectious comorbidities evaluated, nor malnutrition, were significantly associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior literature, older age, low oxygen level, other respiratory symptoms and chronic comorbidities were all risk factors for mortality. Patients presenting with these characteristics were more likely to be hospitalised, providing evidence of effective triage and referral. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04568499.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Oxigênio , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sudão do Sul
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...